Hassard Bonnington LLP - Attorneys At Law - Los Angeles, CA
     
 

 

 

 

ASBESTOS DEFENSE VERDICTS

  • 2010, Charles Duncan, Waters Kraus, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with claimed exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that plaintiff was not exposed to asbestos from defendant’s product.
     

  • 2010, Betty Vaught, Simon Eddins, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that exposure to defendant’s product was not a substantial factor.
     

  • 2010, William Dix, Waters Kraus, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with claimed exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that plaintiff was not exposed to asbestos from defendant’s product.
     

  • 2010, Michael Johansen, Waters Kraus, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2009, William Goebel, Waters Kraus, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2009, Richard Buccola, Hanley, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2009, James Prough, Simon Eddins, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2009, Robert Oberstar, Simon Eddins, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2008 Neva Orwig, Waters Kraus, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with claimed exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that plaintiff was not exposed to asbestos from defendant’s product.
     

  • 2008 Charles Flanery, Paul & Hanley, San Francisco. Confirmed mesothelioma with claimed exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that exposure to defendant’s product was not a substantial factor.
     

  • 2008 Larry Lindquist, Simon Eddins, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with claimed exposure to defendant’s products. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2008 Billie Gowan, Paul & Hanley, San Francisco. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2008 Marguerite Dyer, Waters Kraus, San Francisco. Confirmed mesothelioma with claimed exposure to defendant’s products. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2008 Amanollah Shahabi, Waters Kraus, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with claimed exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that plaintiff was not exposed to asbestos from defendant’s product.
     

  • 2007, Jennifer Drinkwater, Paul & Hanley, San Francisco. Confirmed mesothelioma with claimed exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that plaintiff was not exposed to asbestos from defendant’s product.
     

  • 2006, Melody Dean, Waters Kraus, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2006, Michael Robertson, Waters Kraus, Los Angeles. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.
     

  • 2006, Thomas Halsema, Brent Coon, Alameda. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant’s product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not a substantial factor.
     

  • 2006, Keith Mahar, Paul & Hanley, San Francisco. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant's product. Defense verdict based on finding that exposure to defendant's product was not a substantial factor.
     

  • 2006, Rosemary Brady, Brayton Purcell, San Francisco. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant's product. Defense verdict based on finding that exposure to defendant's product was not a substantial factor.
     

  • 2005, Joan Salyer, Levin Simes, San Francisco. Confirmed mesothelioma with exposure to defendant's product. Defense verdict based on finding that exposure to defendant's product was not a substantial factor.
     

  • 2004, Gloria Peterson, Brayton Purcell, San Francisco. Confirmed lung cancer with exposure to defendant's product. Defense verdict based on finding that defendant’s product was not defective and defendant was not negligent.

 

     

Hassard Bonnington LLP    444 South Flower Street, 17th Floor   Los Angeles, CA 90071    Phone: 213.683.0800    Fax: 213.683.0801
 

 

LA Home     The Firm     Practice Areas     Attorneys     Recent Decisions     Recent Verdicts     Contact Us     Site Map
 

© 2004-10 Hassard Bonnington LLP. All rights reserved. Website by OM